Categorized | Thoughts & Inspiration, Humor

Tags : English, English language, English language anomalies

Only the English Could Have Invented This Language!

Posted on 08 August 2009


English Dictionary

Long-time catcher for the New York Yankees, Yogi Berra is renowned for his use, or rather abuse of the English language.  His unintentionally humorous remarks have lovingly been termed “Yogi-isms” and have become a part of baseball and American culture.  Among the iconic expressions he coined are “You can observe a lot just by watching,” “When you arrive at a fork in the road, take it,” “I don’t want to make the wrong mistake,” and “It ain’t over ‘til it’s over.”  But, the English language doesn’t need the Yogi Berra’s of the world to confuse it.  It does fine on its own.  Consider the following rhyme from an author unknown:

 

We’ll begin with a box, and the plural is boxes,
But the plural of ox becomes oxen, not oxes.
One fowl is a goose, but two are called geese,
Yet the plural of moose should never be meese.
 

 

You may find a lone mouse or a nest full of mice,
Yet the plural of house is houses, not hice.
If the plural of man is always called men,
Then shouldn’t the plural of pan be called pen?

 

If I speak of my foot and show you my feet,
And I give you a boot, would a pair be called beet?
If one is a tooth and a whole set are teeth,
Why shouldn’t the plural of booth be called beeth?

 

Then one may be that, and three would be those,
Yet hat in the plural would never be hose,
And the plural of cat is cats, not cose.

 

We speak of a brother and also of brethren,
But though we say mother, we never say methren.
Then the masculine pronouns are he, his and him,
But imagine the feminine: she, shis and shim!

 

Let’s face it – English is a crazy language.
There is no egg in eggplant nor ham in hamburger;
Neither apple nor pine in pineapple.
English muffins weren’t invented in England.

 

We take English for granted, but if we explore its paradoxes,
we find that quicksand can work slowly, boxing rings are square,
and a guinea pig is neither from Guinea nor is it a pig.

 

And why is it that writers write but fingers don’t fing,
Grocers don’t groce and hammers don’t ham?
Doesn’t it seem crazy that you can make amends but not one amend.
If you have a bunch of odds and ends
and get rid of all but one of them, what do you call it?

 

If teachers taught, why didn’t preachers praught?
If a vegetarian eats vegetables, what does a humanitarian eat?
Sometimes I think all the folks who grew up speaking English
should be committed to an asylum for the verbally insane.

 

In what other language do people recite at a play and play at a recital?
We ship by truck but send cargo by ship.
We have noses that run and feet that smell.
We park in a driveway and drive in a parkway.

 

You have to marvel at the unique lunacy of a language
in which your house can burn up as it burns down,
in which you fill in a form by filling it out,
and in which an alarm goes off by going on.

 

And, in closing, if Father is Pop, how come Mother’s not Mop?

 

AND IF PEOPLE FROM POLAND ARE CALLED POLES THEN PEOPLE FROM
HOLLAND SHOULD BE HOLES AND
THE GERMANS, GERMS !





This post was written by:

- who has written 82 posts on Write On New Jersey.


3 Responses to “Only the English Could Have Invented This Language!”

  1. Candy says:

    I just loved that poem. It reminds me of the wit of dear George Carlin, who is terribly missed.

  2. Kecia Allton says:

    How often do you write your blogs? I enjoy them a lot.

  3. Charles Jubyna says:

    I think your post and site is wonderfully constructed. I found it whild doing some research on the topic. You present this in a way not many others see. I hope to be checking back from time to time to see what else you have to say on other topics.


Site Sponsors

Site Sponsors

Site Sponsors










RSS Loading Feed...

Live Traffic Feed

RSS Loading Feed...